Re: [boost] Re: [boost.range] RFC on small updates

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:

| > iterator_range& operator++(); | > value_type& operator*() const; | | I'm all for it :) | Out of curiosity, will you have ++pre and post++?

I only thought of ++pre.

If you offer ++pre, I see no reason not to offer post++ as well. Best, John -- John Torjo, Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal -- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all -- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/ -v1.6.3 (Resource Splitter) -- http://www.torjo.com/cb/ - Click, Build, Run!