On 24/08/2018 11:09, Edward Diener wrote:
Do you have more information to back up your assertions ? I know nothing about "outreachy" but I see nothing whatever in the description of the organization which suggests discriminatory practices. Or do you really believe that an organization for, let us say, people who have 6 fingers on their right hand, is discriminatory because people who do not have 6 fingers on their right hand are being discriminated against ?
I know nothing about it either, but 5 seconds of Google found this page, which indicates restricted membership: https://www.outreachy.org/apply/eligibility/ Scholarships being discriminatory is not a new thing (and are often used to incentivise "balancing" a perceived inequity in the free market -- which some will argue is good and others will argue is bad). This isn't framed as a scholarship, though, it's framed as an internship, which is employment, which is restricting employment opportunities based on race or gender or sexuality, which is fairly universally regarded as bad. It doesn't matter whether it's the majority or the minority that benefits; it's bad.
Your other remark that Boost is interested in people who show expertise in C++ I agree with. But I do not see why Boost should only be interested in people who show expertise in C++ depending on what organization(s) they belong to.
That's a strawman argument. I don't think Boost cares whether someone is a member of any organisation. Being open to anyone who can write good C++ > being open to anyone who fits specific personal characteristics not under their control.