16 Feb
2018
16 Feb
'18
8:03 p.m.
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:41 AM, a.hagen-zanker--- via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Peter Dimov: It now occurs to me that if my_expr is not
, but , a transform would be able to match it without knowing the tuple type. Zach, are you giving this serious consideration?
No. The library stated out this way, actually. It makes everything a lot more verbose in the implementation, of course, but for the user too. If the user wants the interface locally, she can always add a template alias that papers over the existence of the tuple. Zach