3 Mar
2013
3 Mar
'13
11:56 a.m.
On 3 March 2013 11:03, Vadim Stadnik wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
You've claimed the STL makes your containers "illegal" which is an odd claim that I can't agree with. Extending the STL with alternative containers is not just acceptable, I'm pretty sure it was intended by Stepanov et al.
I do not understand this statement. Because of ".. NOT just acceptable", it sounds like Stepanov et al. are responsible for STL being non-extendable,
No that's the opposite of what it says. Try replacing "just" with "only" if that helps. What I said is that extending the STL is acceptable, and I believe it was intended by the designers.