
15 Aug
2011
15 Aug
'11
6:56 p.m.
Gordon Woodhull <gordon@woodhull.com> writes:
On Aug 13, 2011, at 1:21 PM, "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmut.kaiser@gmail.com> wrote:
so why not leave the existing MPL alone and start over?
Is there any reason a variadic MPL would have a different interface?
Yep. There are plenty of cases in MPL where variadic interfaces would be useful, sequence construction being a primary one. It is a royal pain to convert a C++11 variadic type list into an MPL vector, for example. -Dave