Jody Hagins wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 23:20:29 +0200 Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger@neoscientists.org> wrote:
Jody Hagins wrote:
is_function_type.cpp
is incomplete, as it should test that each type IS what is expected and is NOT everything else.
AFAIK type categorization is about asking if an arbitrary type has some properties...
I'm afraid I don't get your point, here. Can you please elaborate ?
Maybe I'm just being pedantic, but I think tests should be as complete as possible. I have not looked at all tests, but the one I did look at (is_function_type.cpp) seemed a bit lacking on coverage. Obviously, you think at least somewhat similarly, because you have...
Ahh - you are talking about the test. Sorry, I missed the file extension: Actually this is an "example/test hybrid" take a look at libs/function_types/test/arity_and_type.cpp This test is the output of an external code generator in the 'tools' directory and should be much more bullet proof (but this is a "real test" with no "example aspects", so I would not hyperlink it to the documentation). Regards, Tobias