Hi Marco, On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Dean Michael Berris <mikhailberis@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry for the silly question, but what is a RDDL ?
Oh, sorry. I was in a hurry -- RDDL stands for Runtime Dynamic Dispatch Library. :)
I knew it was a dumb question ;-)
I have downloaded boost 1.35 and dispatcher code from sourceforge subversion repository.
It seem a good point to "inject" my overload implementation is the dispatcher class functor: overload it seems, more or less naturally, should replace that...
Am I starting wrong?
If you're set out to replace Boost.Function, then maybe you would replace class functor. However, here are the issues you'll face: 1. You're going to either have to change the implementation of the registry, so that the signature parameter becomes a sequence of signatures instead of just a single signature. This is what you'll have to do if you're out to replace Boost.Function -- which doesn't make much sense as of the moment. 2. You will eventually have to distinguish the registry implementation of an overloaded dispatcher from a single-signature dispatcher. This is because it doesn't make much sense (or any sense) to use an overloaded dispatcher from a single-signature dispatcher. We can take the discussion off-list if you're interested in moving forward. Have a good week ahead. -- Dean Michael C. Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. [http://blog.cplusplus-soup.com] [mikhailberis@gmail.com] [+63 928 7291459] [+1 408 4049523]