Noel Belcourt wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
Does cw-9_4 really support partial specialization of class templates? According to boost.config it does. xpressive's tests are failing on this compiler, with heaps of errors like:
### mwcc Compiler: # In: ..\boost\xpressive\detail\static\productions\independent_compiler.hpp # From: ..\libs\xpressive\test\misc1.cpp # ----------------------------------------- # 128: : transform_compiler<arg_transform, xpressive::detail::seq_tag> # Error: ^ # illegal partial specialization
1) add the missing default template argument to the compiler specialization
template<bool PositiveT> struct compiler<xpressive::detail::lookahead_tag<PositiveT>, xpressive::detail::seq_tag, void> : branch_compiler<xpressive::detail::lookahead_branch<PositiveT>, xpressive::detail::ind_tag> { };
Ah, interesting. Thanks for the suggestion -- I've committed the fix. Let's see what the next round of regression tests reveal. -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com