1 Jun
2005
1 Jun
'05
9:54 p.m.
Peter Dimov wrote: [... regarding (busted) 21.3/5 ...]
My point was that a COW-friendly class should have had
class cow_friendly_string { public:
char get( int i ) const; void set( int i, char ch ); };
sidestepping the above problem.
I take it that you'd like to sorta castrate "cow_unfriendly_string" (the standard one) to make it more user (read: looser) friendly. ;-) It can be done using private std::string. Oder? regards, alexander.