"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger@isonews2.com> wrote in message news:fmqifd$l3k$1@ger.gmane.org...
It's not my responsibility to do a unit testing for you. From where I stand any feature which is not backed up with unit test, can't be considerred supported.
From where I stand testing is a minor concern as long as it's obvious that something /can/ work -- in dubio pro reo.
Can you provide formal proof? Nothing is obvios to me. And without unit test is useless.
Or do you expect us to believe your word?
Believe whatever you want .
I believe your library doesn't work for DLLs. And you didn't even provide a test to prove me wrong.
The purpose of testing is not to prove anything -- it about detecting defects.
The purpose of unit testing is to prove that there are no defects and program/library/class works as expected. Gennadiy