2009/4/16 Joel Falcou <joel.falcou@u-psud.fr>
Indeed it helps. I ended up with the roughly same algorithm but I guess I failed horribly at turning it into a macro. I'll try to get it right.
What part of this thing is not standard ?
See this thread: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2005/06/88185.php It is discussed there. It seems like a lot of compilers accepts the syntax, though.
Why do you split the double in 2 parts instead of storing it in a integral_constant<uint64_t> ?
Very good question. I am thinking the same. Don't remember, but it would definitively make life a lot easier.
Can't it be easier if we defines a float as a value in [0,1> and a power of ten aka FLOAT(0.146824,+6) then ocnvert the a*10^b into m*2^e ?
That's what I did originally, but you loose a lot of precision in the conversion.
Is boost::mpl::double_ planne dot be merged sometimes in main trunk ?
No plan as I know of. Haven't looked at the code for some years now. Regards Peder Holt
Thanks in advance
-- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost