21 Jul
2011
21 Jul
'11
9 a.m.
On 21/07/2011 04:07, Beman Dawes wrote:
The idea is to do what is possible, allowing most non-conforming and legacy compilers and libraries to get more mileage out of Unicode encodings. It won't be perfect, and the typedef technique isn't pretty, but it does seem to solve a problem real users are asking be solved.
What's wrong with defining boost::char32 as a typedef of char32_t if it is available and uint_least32_t otherwise?