Vicente Botet wrote
Le 07/01/12 11:23, Lorenzo Caminiti a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard@> wrote:
On 01/02/2012 10:58 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
Hello all,
Is it possible to add a macro BOOST_CONFIG_LOCAL_TYPES_AS_TEMPLATE_PARAMS to Boost.Config to indicate if local types can be passed as template parameters?
Lorenzo,
I suggest you to follow the process (see http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_48_0/libs/config/doc/html/boost_config/guide...) to add new macros and propose a patch for the trunk to John.
In this way you will have the results for all the trunk testers.
Sure, I'll follow the process- thanks for the link! BTW, from that link: Adding New Defect Macros When you name the macro, follow the BOOST_NO_SOMETHING naming convention, so that it's obvious that this is a macro reporting a defect. Adding New Feature Test Macros When you need to add a macro that describes a feature that the standard does not require, follow the convention for adding a new defect macro (above), but call the macro BOOST_HAS_FOO Following the case of BOOST_NO_VARIADIC_MACROS, I will name this macro BOOST_NO_LOCAL_TYPES_AS_TEMPLATE_PARAMS and document it under the group of "Macros that describe C++0x features not supported" (because this is a defect macro respect to C++11 but it's a feature macro respect to C++03, I'll name it and document it in respect to C++11). Thanks. --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/config-local-types-as-template-params-tp4... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.