27 Dec
2010
27 Dec
'10
2:39 a.m.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
Dean Michael Berris wrote:
Trac can be (and I think, should be) abandoned for something that reflects better the workflow that Boost would want to encourage and that performs better on the machine that is available to it. If the solution is hosted for Boost then I would say it would be better.
I for one am very pleased with Trac. I find it very helpful as it is.
Right, but if you had something else in place that gave you what Trac gives *and* is faster, more pleasant to use, and had a lot more good things going for it -- like it being hosted not by the Boost server -- then maybe you'd like whatever that is too? :D -- Dean Michael Berris about.me/deanberris