21 Sep
2005
21 Sep
'05
9:45 p.m.
Brian Ravnsgaard Riis <brian@riis.as> writes:
Andrey Semashev wrote:
Brian Ravnsgaard Riis wrote:
Rob Stewart wrote:
I agree the "guard" is better. But the variable type name is scope_guard, many scope guard tools are resided in boost::guard namespace, the function for creating guards is make_guard. Aren't there too much guards here?
Yes, probably. As I said, just a thought...
I don't care how large the population of guards is, if "guard" is the right name. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com