15 Nov
2004
15 Nov
'04
3:40 p.m.
On Nov 13, 2004, at 3:12 AM, E. Gladyshev wrote:
Doug Gregor wrote:
As always, please remember to clearly state whether you believe the library should be accepted into Boost.
The library is a good start but I don't think that it should be accepted w/o a native support for named parameters functors. The macros are not good enough.
Eugene
You are referring to a facility such as the one you documented here? http://tinytl.sourceforge.net/#func_named_params_function Could you say why you find this feature so important that the library should be rejected due to the lack of the feature? What concerns does this feature address that the existing interface does not? Doug