3 Sep
2008
3 Sep
'08
5:24 p.m.
on Wed Sep 03 2008, Arno Schödl <aschoedl-AT-think-cell.com> wrote:
I'm not there yet, but I know enough about the problem now that I wouldn't "buy" a partial solution.
Before I start playing around with the problem, is my throwing increment_and_dereference optimization fair game? I believe I can't > do without.
Since dereference does not need to end-check, throwing increment() is probably the basic building block. Fair game?
Sorry, I really don't know what you're asking. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com