Sohail Somani wrote:
Steven Watanabe wrote:
It's not thread safe and the only way I can see to make it so is to have a fixed set of functions and allocate/deallocate Why would it need to be thread safe? Usually one puts thread safety above this kind of utility layer.
Well if you need to implement a C-callback that doesn't have a void * data argument.
You put the thread safety in what the c-function calls. Now if the question really is that the setting of the function object instance isn't thread safe... You would make the code that calls make_c_function thread safe, by using locks for example. Note, calling the c-function, and hence the function object, is thread safe AFAIK. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo