16 Sep
2008
16 Sep
'08
1:01 a.m.
Peter Dimov wrote:
In this case, though, the meaning is unambiguous. (Y*)0 is - obviously - a null pointer "literal" of type Y*. So it's nice. :-)
It's a pitty that function-style casts are invalid here, since pointers don't have constructors. :-) Regards, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...