On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26 AM, DE <satan66613@yandex.ru> wrote:
I don't see how it hurts, so I implemented your suggestion; the constants are now defined as enum { val = # }, instead of having a type. Thanks for your feedback. well actually i meant that you can define all constants in one unnamed enum like
enum { MAX_SPLITS = 11, MAX_FINISHING_SPLITS = MAX_SPLITS + 1, LOG_MEAN_BIN_SIZE = 2, LOG_MIN_SPLIT_COUNT = 9, LOG_FINISHING_COUNT = 31, FLOAT_LOG_MEAN_BIN_SIZE = 2, FLOAT_LOG_MIN_SPLIT_COUNT = 8, FLOAT_LOG_FINISHING_COUNT = 4, MIN_SORT_SIZE = 3000 }; <http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost>
Is there any reason why one approach (unnamed enum for each value vs. single unnamed enum for all) is better than the other?