Douglas Gregor <gregod <at> cs.rpi.edu> writes:
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 02:59 pm, Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2004 01:20 pm, Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
Do you have any suggestions?
I've fixed it on Borland, and tried to fix it on Intel 7.1, Comeau, and Sun based on the error messages (but I don't have those compilers handy to test).
Doug
This is not a fix I am looking for. What you did makes whole facility useless on affected compiler. I look for solution that will retain functionality.
*Which* fix for what compiler? There were multiple changes for multiple compilers there.
Lots of other library tests depend on the test libraries building properly. Building and executing propertly on these compilers is my #1 priority, otherwise, the rest of us can't get any meaningful results out of the regression tests.
Maybe the error in BCB can be fixed, along with ICC and Comeau, by replacing line 225 of unit_test_suite.cpp p_stages_amount.value = p_stages_amount.value+1; with p_stages_amount.set(p_stages_amount.get()+1); which seems to work in ICC and does not force you to unprotect p_stages_amount as you did for BCB. The fix at least works for ICC 7.1 for Windows (I tried). I guess that the problem in ICC and Comeau (which are EDG-based, if I'm not wrong) might have something to do with active issue #385, though I don't know for sure. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo