Paul Fultz II wrote
[...]
Yes, I have run a couple of local tests to test performance. I could pull together some report to put in the documentation. Ideally. it would be good to have a comparison with other libraries as well. I haven't compared it with Hana yet, either, which would be a good idea. However, I do know that the implementation of `fit::conditional` is much faster than the implemenation used for `overload_linearly` in Hana, but I haven't done a direct comparison. I'll try to add something like that. I think it will be useful.
How so? The implementations are very similar, except Hana also allows for non-const function objects. I'd be grateful if you could provide a benchmark, perhaps I could improve Hana's implementation. Regards, Louis -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Fit-Formal-review-Kris-tp4684694p4684731.... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.