David Greene wrote:
I see that a Named Params library has been accepted into Boost. Great!
Is this named template params or named function params?
Function parameters.
I've actually been working on a named template params implementation of my own so I'm particularly curious about what Dave and Daniel have done, whether it be for templates or functions.
Is there an accessible page of documentation somewhere?
There's been a named_template_params.hpp in the sandbox for a long time. What's going on with that? Is there general interest in a named template parameters library?
There has already been a released named_template_params.hpp in boost/detail "forever". http://www.boost.org/boost/detail/named_template_params.hpp IMO named template parameters are unweildy in C++. I prefer "unnamed template parameters" like those described in http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/v2/class.html As a matter of fact, I was just looking into how to extend our named parameters library to handle unnamed function parameters. http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/v2/def.html -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com