Rene Rivera <grafik.list@redshift-software.com> writes:
Douglas Gregor wrote:
Boost regression test failures ------------------------------ Report time: 2005-06-26T15:40:21Z [...] 717 failures in 22 libraries:
Don't know what happened, but there are a few new CW-8.3 regressions now...
|numeric/conversion| converter_test: cw-8_3 udt_support_test: cw-8_3
Pass for me locally.
|preprocessor| seq: cw-8_3
Not easily testable on it's own, as there's no test/Jamfile for BPP.
|type_traits| decay_test: cw-8_3
This change:
<http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/libs/type_traits/test/decay_test.cpp?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&sortby=date> <http://tinyurl.com/ap7uc>
Seems to have caused it. But Dave's comment on the change doesn't say which "Broken compiler" the change was for.
Sorry, it was one of the VC++s; 6 I think. I figured omitting the void would work anywhere. Well, you're probably safe by optionally including the void when on CW, yes? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com