Re: [boost] [c++1] BOOST_NOEXCEPT macros?

On 19.10.2011. 17:47, Stewart, Robert wrote:

Using (1) on existing code could change behavior.

Again, how could it change behaviour? Unless, again,: "...there is a real world person/problem that depends on the defined std::unexpected/std::terminate behaviour of noexcept as opposed to undefined or implementation defined behaviour of a compiler specific in case "someone violates a promise given about the particular function"..." -- "What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate." Neil Postman