Mathias Gaunard-2 wrote
On 17/06/2012 12:45, Dirk Ulrich wrote:
I am working on a C++ based project which forbids the usage of C++ exceptions but it is still preferable to use Boost libraries at least the ones which do not make use of C++ exceptions at all.
All Boost libraries should work with exceptions disabled, with potentially limited functionality. If that is not the case, it's probably a library-specific bug that should be reported.
Hi, I don't see this as a bug but as a nice to have feature. In addition, for some libraries, the subset that could work with exceptions disabled could be minimal. I agree however that a list of libraries that works with exceptions disabled should be built as well as the ones with no-rtti. Anyway, we need some testers that will run the regression test with the specific options. Any volunteers? Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-and-exceptions-tp4631441p4631449.ht... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.