Phil Richards wrote:
What is the relationship between these two pages? Is it documented anywhere?
I think that issues.html might only be displaying issues from compilers that are marked as 'required platforms' (those being the ones whose names appear in bold on summary.html). The compiler list looks a bit out of date though. Phil Richards wrote:
Is it actually an issue that the release has quite a lot of unresolved issues for gcc 4.4?
Most of those failures only occur when the compiler is in c++0x mode, though the failures in GIL do look to be down to bug #3041, which doesn't seem to have been merged to Release. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Confused-by-regression-testing-%22release%22-branch-su... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.