29 Nov
2013
29 Nov
'13
11:30 p.m.
On 29/11/2013 07:28 p.m., Peter Dimov wrote:
Now is perhaps not a very appropriate time to ask, but why don't we seem to have a macro for the <atomic> C++11 header?
A bit of a nitpick, but following existing naming practice such macro should be called BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC instead. Regards, -- Agustín K-ballo Bergé.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com