Re: [boost] [GCC 2.95.3] Boost regression notification (2005-10-28 [HEAD])

On Oct 28, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:

A lot of these failures are for gcc-2.95.3-linux. Do we care enough about 2.95.3 nowadays to consider it a release platform?

I vageuely remember trying to kill GCC 2.95.3 support at one point, but was convinced otherwise. We could just mark it as unusable on new libraries/tests that support it but retain backward compatibility on those libraries that do. Doug