"Dean Michael Berris" <mikhailberis@gmail.com> wrote in message news:6adba9f0702011251m4c852715hb06eb0144c155fd6@mail.gmail.com...
Hi Gennadiy!
On 2/2/07, Gennadiy Rozental <gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com> wrote:
"Dean Michael Berris" <mikhailberis@gmail.com> wrote in message news:45C2358E.3090807@gmail.com...
That being said, that discussion is a good 4 months ago, and would like to ask the following questions to those who might be interested in something like this:
* What degree of integration with Boost.Test be "suitable"? Though I see Boost.Test has a wealth of preprocessor macro's going about, it shouldn't be hard to integrate at that level.
I do not have time at the moment to look though your code. But just as a n information:
Starting Boost1.34 Boost.Test includes "Interaction based testing" support. The support is presented as a framework for different extensions. The two "extensions" implemented already within the Boost.Test is "Logged expectation testing" and "Exception safety testing". If you are interested they are in cvs HEAD and RC.
Interesting, do you have any documentation regarding how to implement extensions?
No I am woring on the docs for this part of Boost.Test.
Or at least can you lead me on to which parts of Boost.Test I should start looking into? I already have Boost CVS HEAD at the moment...
Take a look on: boost/test/ exception_safety.hpp interaction_based.hpp logged_expectations.hpp mock_object.hpp boost/test/impl/ exception_safety.ipp interaction_based.ipp logged_expectations.ipp libs/test/example est_example1.cpp est_example2.cpp logged_exp_example.cpp
How does it correspond to what you are trying to do? Do you see any intersections and or possible additions to what Boost.Test currently presents.
I guess it would be better to show an example of what the BDD interface is about:
std::string str = "Hello, World!"; value(str).should.equal("Hello, World!");
I had been thinking that the implementation of `value(str).should.equal(...)' should use something like BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(str, ...).
Sorry. I do not see your point. Why can't you write: BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(str, "Hello, World!") Maybe after reading code and/or examples you could give me some comparison of what I have and what you want to do. Be aware that I may not be familiar with some of the term you are using. Gennadiy