Re: [boost] [Boost] Compile-time power of a run-time base

John Maddock wrote:

How about simply "known at compile time" as a compromise :-)

John.

I'm a mathematician. And I prefer "known at compile-time". It is the standard term in this context. Also, "known in advance" is imprecise. In advance of what? Both as a mathematician and as a programmer I like precision. --Johan Råde