Re: [boost] BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS can't be nested inside BOOST_PP_IF?

Paul Mensonides wrote:

Tobias Schwinger:

...

Note: - BOOST_PP_IF does not get disabled

IF getting disabled doesn't matter here. The entire ENUM_PARAMS invocation occurs on entry to IF--where IF is not get disabled.

Right, otherwise "BOOST_PP_CAT(f,BOOST_PP_CAT(o,o))" wouldn't work... #define BOOST_PP_LOCAL_MACRO(i) I must not post rubbish when in a hurry. // ... ;-) Thanks for correcting, Tobias