On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:11 AM Peter Dimov via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I agree with Andrey. Design discussions about a library currently under review are supposed to take place on the mailing list. This serves two purposes, it helps reviewers who for any reason are struggling to reach a final accept/reject verdict, and it can encourage people to review the library by piquing their interest.
In hindsight I wish the discussions had taken place on the mailing list. Yet there was far less friction on Slack and ultimately I chose the path of least resistance, as the immediacy of replies in the moment led to a more engaging conversation. Perhaps we might explore how these two separate platforms can be combined to create something greater than each individual part? Peter how do we fix this? Thanks