Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger@neoscientists.org> writes:
AlisdairM wrote:
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
That is the correct version number, but shouldn't the test be
BOOST_WORKAROUND( __BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT( 0x564) )
Assuming Borland produce another compiler, ...
Careful, here -- they did! Well, that is one with a higher version number ;-)
Latest official BCC shipped with BuilderX:
__BORLANDC__ == 0x565
Latest Builder6 upgrade pack:
__BORLANDC__ == 0x564
Kylix (didn't verify it myself - source: Boost.Config):
__BORLANDC__ == 0x570
It seems all are pretty close in terms of portability (for the former two I know it and for Kylix it's another guess reading Boost.Config), so testing for below 0x600 is what you want, I guess (and above 0x551, reading the follow-up).
Why test for below 0x600? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com