Hi, is this library already considered "in review"? I don't see it in the review queue and I guess it's because this last developpement was a SOC project. Joël Lamotte On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 13:47, Ilya Sokolov <ilyasokol@gmail.com> wrote:
On 30.08.2010 22:59, Boris Schaeling wrote:
I checked now why I even had to add -lpthread if it wasn't required in earlier Boost.Process drafts: The new status class uses a worker thread to support asynchronous I/O. So yes, threading=multi is the natural choice. ;) Updated in SVN and in the ZIP file.
I expect bp::status::async_wait() to be used rarely enough, to some degree where BOOST_PROCESS_NO_THREAD is justified.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost