15 Feb
2016
15 Feb
'16
4:58 p.m.
On 18.01.2016, at 20:47, Andrey Semashev
wrote: On 2016-01-18 22:36, Daniel Frey wrote:
That said, I sympathize with fixing the issue when possible. Maybe we could change the default behavior, but offer the old implementation when the user sets BOOST_PLACE_OPERATORS_IN_NAMESPACE_BOOST. And that is only effective when BOOST_NO_OPERATORS_IN_NAMESPACE is *not* used (to avoid breaking the old compilers). Opinions?
Sounds good to me.
I’d like to actually work on this, but my ticket to get access to Boost.Utility is just sitting idle… https://github.com/boostorg/admin/issues/111 If the above ticket is not the right way to move forward, please someone let me know what to do instead. Thanks.