18 Feb
2004
18 Feb
'04
12:35 p.m.
Russell Hind wrote:
Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
[...]
3. It is far from clear if there will be new Borland C++ compiler at all. Borland may decide to drop out of C++ market completely - it may be waste to spend effort with beta until things get clear.
In that case again, why should boost keep supporting it if Borland won't?
Because I may want to? Why should I be prevented from supporting bcc if I so desire? Should I be forced to run my own regression tests in order to provide that support?