14 Mar
2011
14 Mar
'11
6:13 p.m.
On 3/14/2011 11:57 AM, Тимофей Игнатьич wrote:
On 3/14/2011 9:53 AM, Max Sobolev: dummy_type should be placed in a "private" namespace
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:43:00 -0400 Edward Diener<eldiener@tropicsoft.com> What is a "private" namespace ?
Оne that is not supposed to be accessed by the user. The language doesn't enforce this, hence the quotes.
Putting an identifier into boost::type_traits::detail seems pretty "private" to me since "detail" is never meant to be accessed by the end-user for any library. Is that what you were trying to suggest ? If so, i agree with you.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe& other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost