David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes: | on Mon Apr 02 2007, larsbj-AT-gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) wrote: | | > Douglas Gregor <dgregor@osl.iu.edu> writes: | > | > | Boost Regression test failures | > | Report time: 2007-04-01T02:22:36Z | > | | > | This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms. | > | | > | Detailed report: | > | http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... | > | | > | 1 failures in 1 libraries | > | parameter (1) | > | > I already mentioned this "warning" error in another mail, | | There's no such thing as a warning error; that's just a warning. By not fixing warnings in the public api you are forcing users to allow warnings. | I have a bunch of warning fixes that I've been sitting on under the | assumption that it's too late to make such trivial changes to code. I see other warnings as well, but those comes from libs/xxx/src. Quite a different animal. | > but no response yet. | | If you want a response to a serialization library patch, put | [serialization] in the subject line. You should also put it in the SF | patch tracker and assign it to the library's author. Right... did that... no response. -- Lgb