Re: [boost] [CMake] what to do now?

14 Apr 2016


      On Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 11:51:51 AM UTC-5, Edward Diener wrote:
...
On 4/14/2016 9:55 AM, Paul Fultz II wrote:
...
...
On Apr 14, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Paul Fultz II 
...
...
...
On Apr 14, 2016, at 6:01 AM, Peter Dimov 
javascript:> wrote:
...
...
P F wrote:
...
Does lightweight_test depend on something else? If so,
javascript:> wrote:
lightweight_test could be moved to a separate module. This way Boost.Config 
would depend on Boost.LightweightTest and Boost.Core would depend on 
Boost.Config and Boost.LightweightTest.
...
...
...
lightweight_test depends on Config for BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS, used in
BOOST_TEST_THROWS. I thought about moving it to Assert, which seems like a 
logical place for it, but Assert depends on Config for BOOST_LIKELY.
Since Boost.Config only uses it for BOOST_TEST, it easy enough to just 
write:
#define BOOST_TEST(x) if (!(x)) { std::cout << “FAILED”; std::abort(); }
However, Boost.Config's test still depends on type traits.
Well actually Boost.Config could use Boost.TypeTraits when 
BOOST_NO_CXX11_STD_ALIGN is defined, otherwise it could use the standard 
type traits. This would at least get rid of the cycle on modern compilers.
I think that should be BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_TYPE_TRAITS rather than 
BOOST_NO_CXX11_STD_ALIGN.
Yes, even better. Thanks.
...
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: 
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost