Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?

Ian Emmons <iemmons <at> bbn.com> writes:

I can't speak for Paul, of course, but I would like it if I could build Boost.Test libraries (libboost_unit_test_framework*) without the monitor stuff (libboost_test_exec_monitor* and libboost_prg_exec_monitor*).

Is this a joke? Former is deprecated long ago and later has nothing to do with unit testing. And either one has nothing to do with unit test framework. Gennadiy