On 02/14/2005 09:21 AM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
David Abrahams wrote: [snip]
I think the fusion tuples are already TR1-compatible (?) and we are supposed to transition over to them immediately (?) anyway. Joel?
Yes. Fusion has been here with us for almost 2 years now and the code is very mature. I've already used it in a couple of projects and it is holding up pretty well. If possible, I'd like to transition to it as soon as possible. I tried to contact Jaakko
Could you provide some benchmarks justifying use of fusion tuple vs. indexed_types/composite_product.hpp. I know David provided some reasons in: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/115108 however, no benchmarks were provided and no "detailed" justifcation explaining why it would be better than composite_product. Indeed, it would be impossible at that time since apparently the composite_product code hadn't been looked at, according to this quote: I guess you're assuming I've looked at your code again ;-) from: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/115530 I'd be happy to help with coding and running benchmarks.