Re: [boost] Another set of macros to deprecate (and then remove)?

...

Thanks. This proves that the choice is deliberate.

However, it doesn't answer whether using the double-negative is a good idea. Why not use BOOST_STDC_NAMESPACE and BOOST_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES instea

NO macros are for defects HAS macros are for features

Correct, that was the original intention. Double negative or not, it makes it quite explicit what the workaround is for. John.