23 Feb
2006
23 Feb
'06
4:46 p.m.
"John Maddock" <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> writes:
Didn't we decide that flags for conformance should always be in the form of
BOOST_NO_some-conforming-c++-feature
so that unless something special is done, the assumption will be that the compiler conforms?
Absolutely: however BOOST_TT_HAS_CONFORMING_IS_CLASS_IMPLEMENTATION was one of yours I believe: chuckles, ducks, runs for cover....
<dave quietly whistles "dixie" while hoping nobody notices he's checking in the fix> -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com