Re: [boost] Range-aware version of min and max

I'm actually glad we agree here :) I assume your implementation of numeric_min and numeric_max can take two arguments of differing types, and only does the promotion / demotion on the return? Unless you're planning to submit in the immediate future, could you post the implementation in this thread (assuming it's of reasonable length) so I can take a look? Zach On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Neil Groves <neil@grovescomputing.com>wrote:

In my experience of using arithmetic type promotion and demotion it is often desirable to allow customisation of the promotion policy through a template parameter while providing a default policy that always preserves accuracy.