Re: [boost] Infinite precision integer draft

So the unsigned_integer would have a static method void set_modulus( const integer & ).

I'd prefer not to have a program-global modulus. Remember that we're also trying to put threading into TR2. Alternatives: - Optional modulus argument to certain functions. This seems to be the approach that Mathematica chooses. - Maybe a reference to the modulus in the constructor. [ Yes, I know that NTL uses the static modulus approach. Still, my gut feeling tells me this is suboptimal. ] BTW, it seems strange that modular arithmetic should restricted to unsigned integers. Regards -Gerhard -- Gerhard Wesp ZRH office voice: +41 (0)44 668 1878 ZRH office fax: +41 (0)44 200 1818 For the rest I claim that raw pointers must be abolished.