Tom Brinkman <reportbase@yahoo.com> writes:
Mini-reviews would be very useful. Im shur that each boost developer/user could contribute a few small, useful algorithms. It would be a great way to increase the level of participation by developers who want to contribute but dont have the time to write a complete library.
I should also point out that we have the concept of fast track reviews http://www.boost.org/more/formal_review_process.htm#Fast-Track but I don't think these things meet the criteria. It's up to you whether to introduce yet another kind of review process, but I'm concerned that might end up with a hodgepodge of not-very-thoroughly-inspected and not-very-interoperable components. So, how will we keep the overall quality high? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com