18 Jul
2012
18 Jul
'12
9:38 p.m.
Hopefully others will chime in here with their requirements as well. Cheers all, John.
Even though I can't use it due to lack of experience, I know what I would like. * Small pools going all the way down to, say, tens of bytes, like 32 bytes. * Near-zero overhead for creating static and stack-based pools. * The ability to lodge my own near-zero overhead custom allocator in a pool without having two write the whole allocator.But maybe I don't know much about Boost.Pool yet. Best regards, Chris.