
8 Jun
2011
8 Jun
'11
4:04 p.m.
Assuming I am right, I think this means that we need yet another macro (Groans and Cries of Oh No, not another!)
because
BOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_LOWEST
not defined is no longer an indicator that
max_digits10 is available (and its values correct).
So do we need
BOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_MAX_DIGITS10
which should be defined by default, and only undefined for those libraries supporting C++0X std::numeric_limits with correct values like recent GCC - and others (but not <= VC10)?
Views?
Sigh.... I guess so. Care to submit a patch? John.