Re: [boost] [shmem] Some proposals for open issues from the review

Rene Rivera wrote:

Peter Dimov wrote:

...

Ion Gaztañaga wrote:

[...]

...

for example), I'm proposing the Boost.IPC or Boost.InterProcess name (boost::ipc or boost::interprocess namespace).

I like IPC.

I don't like IPC, because the library is not just for communications. "InterProcess" seems like the most descriptive.

IPC > InterProcess, even for a library that is not just for communications. It's a better name, not necessarily a better description, just like Shmem is a better name than shared_memory. It's also a better namespace name that is immediately usable without an alias. Just my opinion, of course. :-)